Comments on: Blonde, Bronzed, Silicone-Enhanced

By: Xuan

Xuan — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:25:57 +0000

Notice how the football guy demonstrates his value of hot women by placing his hand squarely on her bloody arse.

I don’t like where society’s going with this; pretty soon everyone will be wearing “glamourous” garments made entirely of jewels connected together, worn strategically to enhance breasts and serve as a little more than just revealing.

By: marilyn

marilyn — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:42:02 +0000

Audrey rulz. Her style just can’t go out of style =D

By: Angela

Angela — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:47:36 +0000

I hadn’t heard of Clare Oliver before. That’s awful what happened to her. I can’t imagine what it’d be like knowing you only have a few days left.

I’ve never beem into sun tanning, and tanning salons. I mean – you’re COOKING your skin. And my skin is especially sensitive to the sun, as I’m very VERY fair-skinned. People always tell me to go out and get a tan, but… no thanks? I’m not going to cook my skin, thank you very much. Besides, I like the colour of my skin.

“Yes, even silicone-enhance breasts succumb to gravity…”
Silicone-enhanced breasts actually seem to be the first to succumb to gravity…

By: Kaylee

Kaylee — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:07:58 +0000

It’s amazing how the richest celebs can only afford so little fabric ;o Everything glamorous seems so fake.

By: Chantelle

Chantelle — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:58:50 +0000

“Fashion fades, only style remains the same.”

–Coco Chanel

By: Aisling

Aisling — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:38:36 +0000

Well, I prefer fashion to glamour any day! But then, I’m an old-fashioned girl when it comes to that sort of thing. Get me a knee-length dress with a peter pan collar, and I’m happy. Ha ha. I always say to my mom, “if I ever go to one of these events, I shall be wearing the prettiest, girliest, nicest OFF-THE-RACK creation out there.” Some of the expense is just ridiculous! At The Emmys, I saw people wearing 10 000$ dresses, meanwhile, “Heroes,” star Ali Larter’s awesome red dress only cost a little over 1000$. And she looked just as good as everyone else there!

By: Corinne

Corinne — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:31:39 +0000

No clue who those other people are, but I completely agree that AH, and CH were amazingly glamorous. They’re films are some of my faves today.

The crazy celebrity has become someone to ignore, at least in my sphere.

By: Jordie

Jordie — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:07:08 +0000

Call me stupid, but I always thought fashion and glamour were pretty much the same thing. Are you trying to say that it's a trend? Reply: Not a trend. As I see it, fashion, glamour, and trendy are firmly set apart. Fashion is about classic clothing items that are always in fashion, no matter what the era - think, like I mentioned, Audrey Hepburn. Glamour is about being glitzy and having one's chest and butt out - think Jordan (uh...not you Jordie, but Jordan). Trendy is about manipulating street style and influencing the clothes that tweenies will be wearing in a few months time - think anyone from Young Hollywood, like how Lilo started the "black tights underneath short dresses" trend.

By: Amber

Amber — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:22:04 +0000

Ah! The WAG as the British press has dubbed them. Coleen McLoughlin is living proof that money can’t buy you class nor good fashion sense.

While I avidly watch the Oscars, Golden Globes, The Emmys for the fashion I really like the classier people there. You know, your Rachel Weisz and your Helen Mirren type people.