<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Is Not A Descriptor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/</link>
	<description>A blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>I think I was about 13 when I was deeply addicted to the X-files so I had a pretty big crush on Mr. Duchovny.  However, now... well I could never really understand my teen choices to begin with!  He&#039;s pretty cuckoo-mcgoos!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I was about 13 when I was deeply addicted to the X-files so I had a pretty big crush on Mr. Duchovny.  However, now&#8230; well I could never really understand my teen choices to begin with!  He&#8217;s pretty cuckoo-mcgoos!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kycoo</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4456</link>
		<dc:creator>Kycoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4456</guid>
		<description>He has an interesting beard. =/

Hot is certainly accurate for California. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has an interesting beard. =/</p>
<p>Hot is certainly accurate for California. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belinda</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4454</link>
		<dc:creator>Belinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4454</guid>
		<description>I found him semi-attractive in the X-files, but the beard is really not working for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found him semi-attractive in the X-files, but the beard is really not working for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4450</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4450</guid>
		<description>The sub-tagline should be: Obviously not very.

haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sub-tagline should be: Obviously not very.</p>
<p>haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chans</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Chans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>Hmm, after looking at the picture hot is not something that is on my list of &#039;word association&#039; 

But then again judging someone by his / her looks is just shallow so why bother :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, after looking at the picture hot is not something that is on my list of &#8216;word association&#8217; </p>
<p>But then again judging someone by his / her looks is just shallow so why bother :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rilla</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Rilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>^ Lol my friend&#039;s so into Matt Damon. But I don&#039;t think David Duchovny and even Matt Damon to be hot. The guy in Step Up is the &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; kind of hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Lol my friend&#8217;s so into Matt Damon. But I don&#8217;t think David Duchovny and even Matt Damon to be hot. The guy in Step Up is the <em>real</em> kind of hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>I was going for Nellie&#039;s logic on this one. Because there isn&#039;t anyway that somebody could associate him with &#039;hot&#039;. No way. That&#039;s reserved for people like Matt Damon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going for Nellie&#8217;s logic on this one. Because there isn&#8217;t anyway that somebody could associate him with &#8216;hot&#8217;. No way. That&#8217;s reserved for people like Matt Damon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t find David Duchovny attractive? huh. He doesn&#039;t seem so bad to me.

I also think fornication and California itself have something to do with the &#039;hot&#039; description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t find David Duchovny attractive? huh. He doesn&#8217;t seem so bad to me.</p>
<p>I also think fornication and California itself have something to do with the &#8216;hot&#8217; description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nellie</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>Nellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>... or maybe even fornication?

Fornication is hot. Not with David Duchovny though. *shudders*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; or maybe even fornication?</p>
<p>Fornication is hot. Not with David Duchovny though. *shudders*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nellie</title>
		<link>http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>Nellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jing-wen.com/2007/08/25/hot-is-not-a-descriptor/#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>Maybe they mean how hot can California get?

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reply:&lt;/strong&gt; Dude, you&#039;re ruining my Duchovny-bagging with logic. :P&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they mean how hot can California get?</p>
<p><em><strong>Reply:</strong> Dude, you&#8217;re ruining my Duchovny-bagging with logic. :P</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

