JANE IS A FUCKTARD
July 20, 2007 | Filed under Online
Oh, and just because I can?
JANE IS A FUCKTARD.
NB: Explanations in various threads on Snark
17 Responses to JANE IS A FUCKTARD
Leave a Reply
I reserve the right to edit or delete your comment as I see fit, though I only delete comments from anonymous commenters, or people with multiple aliases. Using a genuine name/email combination will ensure that your comment is approved.
… Aw man, I ran out of food to eat while watching all the drama unfold.
Oh well, water will do :D
Jennii on July 20, 2007 #
I can’t believe I missed all of this! D: Whyyy?! I never get to take part in all the fun e-drama.
Josh on July 20, 2007 #
I agree with this, I didn’t think you’d stoop this low though Amanda :-X
Reply: Merely verbalising what everyone is thinking. :)
Matt on July 20, 2007 #
Oh man. I want to know the story!
Juice on July 20, 2007 #
I missed it! I always miss the e-drama *pouts*
Nikki on July 20, 2007 #
Coles Notes Version?
Mike Haddad on July 20, 2007 #
No argument there.
Did you see? She edited one of her replies in the Fat Tax thread with a fake spoiler. Very mature.
Jordie on July 20, 2007 #
I haven’t been to Snark in ages. I guess that means I’ll have to start visiting again!
Rafia on July 20, 2007 #
I’m in no way supportive of what she did, especially since she very well knows SO MANY MEMBERS are trying to avoid spoilers. I’m pretty disappointed in what she did, even though I don’t particularly care about spoilers myself.
However, I do feel sorry for her. I’m not saying she makes good comments, but was it necessary for people to eventually just stoop to “LOL Jane” and ignoring her? It just smacks of needless mockery. She might be very frustrating, but it had seemed to me that the very recent posts, people have just completely dismissed what she said, and have been saying “LOL Jane” a lot. *Shrugs* I don’t think that is anything admirable either.
While she isn’t good with thinking coherently a lot of the time, in the past she’s at least be calm and stable in addressing so many member’s criticism. Now lately, all she’s been getting is mockery. And she responds to that in an immature fashion. It just strikes me that she’s not the only one being immature here.
Reply: Honestly, I find it hard to reply with anything but LOL JANE when she’s trying to say that blame doesn’t fall on drug dealers, but on drug users.
Belinda on July 20, 2007 #
… and here I swore that I won’t be swayed by spoilers for the last book *grumbles* True, I did read Paddy’s post (as well as Han’s related one)… but still. I like those two as a couple *stomps off to watch the movie*
Vera on July 20, 2007 #
Oh dear.
Emily on July 20, 2007 #
haha
Bobbi-lee on July 20, 2007 #
What?
WHAT?
Tracey on July 20, 2007 #
@Belinda: you know what they say.. “fight fire with fire”. Or, to switch it around a little to make it more obvious what I’m getting at: “fight idiots with idiocy”.
It’s not admirable that she accepted criticism well, it’s amusing. Nine times out of ten she simply didn’t understand what was being said to her. The word you’re looking for is “oblivious”.
Jem on July 20, 2007 #
Yeah, I know it’s what everyones thinking and I don’t blame you for it or anything it just doesn’t feel very Amanda-ish! :p
Matt on July 21, 2007 #
Ew, don’t give her hits.
Ambie on July 21, 2007 #
Aww, I feel sorry for her. :(
Then again, I don’t really know the whole story. After a few pages of e-drama on Snark, I get bored. What? E-drama? Boring!?
Aravis on July 21, 2007 #